When travelling from a P2P session, I met a travel
consultant on my way home on a bus journey. When I looked at him, I had a
pretty good idea that I knew him from somewhere around my locality. I was
thinking to begin a conversation with him when he abruptly enquired of my
travelling destination. I gladly told him that we were travelling to the same
place. Our brief journey lasted only for 15 minutes, but what transpired from
our conversation was very pragmatically true. Our conversation revolved around Bangladesh
current political crisis. Something that caught my thought was his concern
about the danger of not doing enough to remove the ‘psychopath’ leader Sheikh
Hasina, and her team of blood suckers from running the country. He was adamant
that her government was destroying the country economically, socially and
politically.
When I asked him, what can be done to alleviate the
suffering of the people, as the opposition has lost meaningful momentum for
agitation on the street? He paused for a little, and did not answer my question
directly to the point, but explained some points that even I had been thinking
for awhile. He said, “Brother, Begum Zia is not like Hasina, when Hasina talks,
she forgets everything about decency, and has no problem in using foul
languages against her opponent, but in spite of this barrage of indecent
languages both inside and outside parliament, Begum Zia showed her
nobility.” “This woman, Sheik Hasina,
made so much fuss about her ear problem at the time of last army led
government, and cleverly left the country, while her rival, Begum Zia, insisted
on staying in Bangladesh, despite relentless pressure from the generals to have
her exiled. This is called patriotism.” He continued on to say, “But the
difference between people who run BNP and
the people who run Awamileague is that the former by nature are gentlemen like,
and are not natural killers, but the later would not give a damn to the
country, or people, and would kill to retain power.” His word brought instant memory of Shapla
Chottor massacre and killing of Jamat Shibir on 28th of February in
my mind.
My companion continued with his analysis giving me his
sketch for a solution to the impasse. He said, “Awamileague will not give in
power easily, they are prepared to kill, arrest, and massacre any people that
oppose them in a democratic form of agitation. The only solution would be, to
be prepared to use the same force, or at least meaningful force to defend and
attack the person who comes to kill you.” I said, “Do you mean a civil
war?” He told me that this is the only
way to remove a government that does not respect human life, or any civilized
norm. He may be right in this; the current crisis can not be resolved through
dialogue. Awamileague has already made its decision to go for election without
a caretaker government. It has placed the entire instrument to engineer the
election in its favour; they even have sketched a well thought design to bring
in third force in case a civil war breaks. In his opinion, a concerted effort
is needed by business men, civic society, intellectual, and politician to bring
back democracy, civil rights, freedom and justice. Every people and political
activist of the opposition is thinking in this line of resistance. A blog I
read yesterday posted in ‘fugstar.blogspot.co.uk’ cached my eye. The bloger
wrote, “It reminds us also of the need to create a new form of protest that
elude the censor and which are less predictable than huge protests” What the
bloger was alluding to has commonality to my companion on the bus. A
conventional protest without ability to defend is suicidal. So let the
opposition prepare before going in to action. Lives will be lost, but freedom
and dignity is more important than slavery.
No comments:
Post a Comment